Subject: CIW September93 Meeting Technical Objectives

From: "Jack Sanders (8-444-4459)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 93 16:12:39 EDT

Technical proposals contained in the documents listed below will be
considered during the SIG meetings on September 8 and 9.  If consensus is
reached during a SIG meeting, CIW approval will be requested at the CIW
plenary session on the 10th.  The list below contains the next possible
approval level for each architecture proposal, in addition to the name of
the SIG, the title of the submission containing the proposal, the name of
the file in the CIW document library, and the date (in parentheses) by
which the file will be available in the library.  Please review these
proposals and be prepared to work toward approval of these submissions at
the meeting.

Closed Pages:

  Non-Blocking:  CPI-C Level 2 Nonblocking Enhancements,
    /ciw/sig/nonblock/nb-cp.ps (8/25/93)

Approved Pages (as amended):

  OSI TP:  Proposed Enhancements to CPI-C for Support of
    OSI Distributed Transaction Processing,
    /ciw/sig/osi-tp/osi-prop.ps (5/12/93)
   The extensions for OSI TP have been incorporated in the CPI-C Spec,
   CPI-C 2.0 First Review Draft, July 1993, and an additional
   document containing updates to the 5/12/93 OSI TP proposal
   will be available in advance.

Approved Pages:

  Full Duplex:  CPI-C Full-Duplex Conversations and Expedited Data
    (Approved Pages Proposal based on CPI-C Spec review draft 07/16/93)
    /ciw/sig/fdx/ciwfdxap.ps (8/25/93)

  Directory:  CPI-C Changes for Use of Distributed Directory,
    /ciw/sig/dir/dirchg.ps  (8/25/93)
   This document has been updated with changes are agreed to and
   distributed at the last CIW meeting.

  Security:  CPI-C Use of Third Party Authentication,
    /ciw/sig/sec/secpages.ps  (8/24/93)

Approved Direction:

  Non-Blocking:  CPI-C Queue-Level Processing and Multi-threading Support
    /ciw/sig/nonblock/nb-qmtad.ps (8/25/93)

A proposal for Secondary Information will be distributed at the CIW
meeting and discussed, but no change in status will be requested.

Regards,
Jack